|
What Happened: Inside the Bush White House and Washington's Culture of Deception | 
| Author: Scott Mcclellan
Publisher: PublicAffairs
Category: Book
List Price: $27.95
Buy New: $18.45
You Save: $9.50 (34%)
New (79) Used (58) Collectible (6) from $7.19
Rating:  201 reviews
Media: Hardcover
Edition: 1
Pages: 368
Number Of Items: 1
Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.5
Dimensions (in): 9.5 x 6.4 x 1.3
ISBN: 1586485563
Dewey Decimal Number: 973.931
EAN: 9781586485566
ASIN: 1586485563
Publication Date: May 28, 2008
Shipping: Eligible for Super Saver Shipping
Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours
| |
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
With unprecedented candor, one of George W. Bush's closest aides takes readers behind the scenes of the Bush presidency, and what exactly happened to take it off course. Scott McClellan was one of a few Bush loyalists from Texas who became part of his inner circle of trusted advisers, and remained so during one of the most challenging and contentious periods of recent history. Drawn to Bush by his commitment to compassionate conservatism and strong bipartisan leadership, McClellan served the president for more than seven years, and witnessed day-to-day exactly how the presidency veered off course. In this refreshingly clear-eyed book, written with no agenda other than to record his experiences and insights for the benefit of history, McClellan provides unique perspective on what happened and why it happened the way it did, including the Iraq war, Hurricane Katrina, Washington's bitter partisanship, and two hotly-contested presidential campaigns. He gives readers a candid look into who George W. Bush is and what he believes, and into the personalities, strengths, and liabilities of his top aides. Finally, McClellan looks to the future, exploring the lessons this presidency offers the American people as we prepare to elect a new leader.
|
| Customer Reviews: Read 20 more reviews...
 He Seems Sincere November 18, 2008
William E. Linney
I got interested in this book when I saw Scott McClellan on "Meet the Press" one morning. It was either Tim Russert's last or next-to-last show before he died suddenly.
I didn't know what to expect from Mr. McClellan, so I watched. I was amazed to see a guy that seemed to be expressing genuine regret to the American people for letting them down. It wasn't exactly his fault, but he does seem to blame himself to some degree. Anyway, I was intrigued by his sincerity--and not only that, but his apparent forthrightness and honesty.
So when I saw the book at the library, I picked it up, and got very interested after just a few pages--you know, the way you do when you read a thriller-type novel. I enjoyed the book for the following reasons:
-It's well written. Good writing is always enjoyable (to me, at least).
-It had "insider information." It was like having a window into the inner workings of the Bush administration.
-It was even-handed. It was not a Bush-bash, just an honest reckoning of what happened (thus the title). When Bush failed, he points that out. When Bush did something right, he points that out, too. That gave the book a sense of genuineness that I thought was one of the book's major strengths.
As for the subject matter, it seemed the main points of the book were these (among others):
-That Bush is not an intellectual leader (i.e. someone who thinks things through to the end) but someone who leads by conviction and gut instinct. McClellan says that Bush is plenty smart, but that's not the way he operates. He leads on a decision-making level, leaving his cabinet and advisers to actualize those conviction-based decisions--to make them work in the real world. One of McClellan's major criticisms of the Bush's top people (e.g. Rice and Powell) is that they didn't challenge Bush enough on some policy decisions. McClellan describes Bush's top echelon for the most part as a group of yes men (and yes women? yes people?).
-Bush was not forthright about the motives for starting the Iraq War. Bush was interested in Iraq long before 9/11. He holds a deep belief that everyone should be allowed to live in freedom, free from repressive regimes. McClellan quotes Bush talking about his desire to spread democracy in the world. But when the time came to invade Iraq, Bush connected it to WMDs, not his desire to spread democracy. On the surface, it looked like Bush wanted to invade Iraq because of WMDs, but deep down he really just wanted to spread democracy. McClellan faults Bush for this, because when Bush was running for office he said he would restore honor and dignity to the office, and change the way Washington worked. In McClellan's view, this lack of forthrightness on Bush's part went against what Bush had promised to do earlier, and so Bush failed to keep his word.
-McClellan, in his role as press secretary, was used by those above him to deceive the press. Bush had promised to fire whoever was involved, but did not. Again, McClellan faults Bush for not keeping his word to do so...but this is somewhat of a complicated, convoluted issue, so you are on you own on this one.
There are other points, but these seemed to me to be the main ones.
One thing occasionally bothered me: McClellan seems to psychoanalyze Bush to excess sometimes. It's good to try to provide a portrait of Bush's thinking and leadership style, but sometimes the psychoanalysis went a little far (seems to me, at least). However, I got the feeling that McClellan was doing this not only to explain it to the reader, but to try to figure it out for himself, and make sense of it all, so he could sleep at night.
A Great Overview of the Permanent Campaign November 4, 2008
Will S. (Topeka, KS)
I think Scott does a brilliant job of adequately covering his time in the Bush White house, and creating a good timeline of events to illustrate his opinion of life "inside the bubble." From the constant campaign to the collection of agreement, McClellan seeks to clarify the secretive world that existed while he was press secretary. I think the author goes to great lengths to specifically NOT bash or degrade anyone in this book. I found it an honest view that if anything, restated its point perhaps a bit too much. Overall, it was refreshing to have an honest look at the culture inside, something we as the public had wanted since day one. Well worth the read and quite interesting. You may not agree with Scott's opinions, but they are genuine and not malicious.
Who really ran this country November 3, 2008
David Tapscott (Yuma, AZ USA)
In my personal opinion, VP Dick Cheney gave the orders and decieved everyone for his own political gain. President Bush was just a prop giving Cheney all the power.
|
|
|
| |
