|
The WMD Mirage: Iraq's Decade of Deception and America's False Premise for War (Publicaffairs Reports) | 
| Creator: Craig R. Whitney Publisher: PublicAffairs Category: Book
Buy New: $16.95
New (74) Used (67) Collectible (4) from $0.01
Rating: 2 reviews
Media: Paperback Pages: 704 Number Of Items: 1 Shipping Weight (lbs): 1.7 Dimensions (in): 7.8 x 5.5 x 1.7
ISBN: 1586483617 Dewey Decimal Number: 956.704432 EAN: 9781586483616 ASIN: 1586483617
Publication Date: April 24, 2005 Shipping: Eligible for Super Saver Shipping Availability: Usually ships in 24 hours
| |
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
|
| Editorial Reviews:
Product Description
Features the official report from the bipartisan Commission on the Intelligence Capabilities of the United States Regarding Weapons of Mass Destruction--named by President Bush to try to prevent similar policy debacles in Iran and North Korea.
It also includes the official speeches, United Nations reports, and declassified government investigation reports that show, step by step, how the United States got the crucial question of arms in Iraq so terribly wrong.
The documents show that:
The CIA concluded in 2002 that Iraq had reconstituted its WMD programs, but in fact Saddam had dismantled them;
American policymakers consistently assumed the worst case: regardless of his denials, if there was intelligence that Saddam might be making weapons of mass destruction then he had them and was hiding them. UN inspectors, by contrast, assumed that thorough inspection and insistence on complete Iraqi documentation could determine what the truth was;
UN inspectors were frustrated by Saddam's refusal to cooperate freely and thwarted by American military impatience just as they thought themselves on the verge of success;
American inspectors sent in after the war in 2003 found no weapons of mass destruction and how they--and Washington insiders--began to question the basis of the prewar intelligence.
The New York Times editor and contributor to The 9/11 Investigations (PublicAffairs, 2004) Craig R. Whitney has scoured the documents surrounding the search for Iraq's weapons of mass destruction. In The WMD Mirage, he has assembled the most revelatory and pertinent of these. The result is a startling narrative trail that leads readers through the intelligence and misinformation leading into Iraq--and a telling portrait of how the Bush administration, whether deliberately or unintentionally, with scant evidence and largely against the will of the international community, convinced the American people and their few allies of the urgent need for war.
A must-read for scholars, voters, and anyone interested in the goings-on in Iraq, the growing threats perceived elsewhere, and the truth behind our frayed international reputation, The WMD Mirage offers the real story of the missing weapons of mass destruction. In offering such a clear-eyed and documented picture of how we got it wrong in Iraq, The WMD Mirage is the first widely-available book that also includes the new conclusions of the Presidential Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission.
|
| Customer Reviews:
The Definitive Report May 14, 2005 John Matlock (Winnemucca, NV) 4 out of 6 found this review helpful
Americans absolutely love conspiracy theories. It seems that it is much easy to believe in a conspiracy with 'they' being out to get you than to simply say that a bunch of people screwed up. And now it seems that we've finally found one to, hopefully, replace the conspiracy that killed Kennedy and perhaps even the one about the UFO's at Roswell.
The truth appears to be bad enough. The intelligence agencies of the United States, Britain, Australia, Israel, Germany, France and Russia all got it wrong. (Yes, France and Russia believed in the WMD's as well but didn't want an invasion because they were getting preferential oil pricing from Iraq to trade for weapons.)
The real problem here is that if we believe in a conspiracy, then we won't feel it necessary to take the steps to fix the real problem.
This book has been dismissed as centrist propaganda by one reviewer. I don't know what that is, left wing I know, right wing I know. Centrist to me says that the writer is trying to be unbiased - and that's what I really want to read. It seems to me that the book is pretty fairly balanced. My only real complaint is that it doesn't have an index, and with its format, it is sometimes difficult to go back and see where it said something.
For another report, the article in the Atlantic in the January/February 2004 by Kenneth M. Pollack titled Spies, Lies, and Weapons: What Went Wrong is highly recommended - It's available on line at no charge.
nothing but centrist propaganda! April 24, 2005 R. Hutchinson (a world ruled by fossil fuels and fossil minds) 4 out of 12 found this review helpful
This compilation of documents, edited by a New York Times reporter, is nothing but centrist propaganda. It focuses on "failures" of the CIA and intelligence-gathering, but includes NOTHING on the Office of Special Plans, the Lie Factory in the Pentagon that deliberately spun intel to support the neoconservative agenda of war-on-Iraq-no-matter-what and reported directly to Cheney. The excellent Mother Jones article called "The Lie Factory" has yet to be expanded into a book as far as I know, but look for it on the Mother Jones website. The best book on the subject is Bamford's A PRETEXT FOR WAR (see my review). The Carnegie Endowment for Peace was a source of excellent information debunking the Bush Administration's case for war long before the war was launched. The idea that "everyone thought the threat was real" until the post-war discovery of no weapons is nonsense, nothing but post-hoc propaganda which serves to justify the war.
See HOODWINKED by John Prados for a much better analysis of the "WMD" issue, with full documentation (see my review). The very category WMD is a propaganda device which lumps nuclear weapons in with the much less dangerous chemical and biological weapons, thus magnifying the threat from the latter. The mass media acceptance of the term WMD is one of the biggest victories of the neoconservatives.
There was a Senate committee report on the WMD intel that came out in the summer of 2004. It was eclipsed in the media by the 9/11 report. But that Senate committee report was supposed to have a follow-on, a Part 2, that examined the deliberate distortion of intel by the Bush Administration -- no surprise, the GOP-run Senate has never issued that report.
See my NEOCON LIES & WARS FOR OIL list for more.
The "intel incompetence" line is very convenient for Bush and Cheney -- it absolves them of responsibility for an unnecessary war. But it is far from a secret that they were itching for "regime change" in Iraq from the day they occupied the levers of power. Was the Pentagon Office of Special Plans a hallucination, or did Feith report to Cheney with intel cooked to support an invasion? Just look at Powell's pitiful presentation to the U.N. -- that's all they had? Obviously a decision had been made and the lack of evidence be damned. This is not an exotic conspiracy theory, and it's not "having it both ways." The CIA was not calling the shots -- the CIA incompetence from the P.O.V. of Rumsfeld, Cheney & Bush was not that they exaggerated the threat, but rather that they couldn't produce convincing evidence that a threat existed to support the plan for war. This has been in plain sight all along, and it is a blatant after-the-fact coverup to bury the truth in a blizzard of misleading official reports.
If you don't believe me, and you're inclined to think this is a "stupid conspiracy theory" as our helpful intel insider Maskirovka would have it, check out the books by Bamford and Prados, check out the Mother Jones article, and check out the website of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace -- look for the article "Origins of Regime Change in Iraq" by Joseph Cirincione, Director of the Non-Proliferation Project at CEIP, which traces the neocons' unceasing efforts between 1991 and 2003.
|
|
|
| |